With U.S. inequality at its highest point since 1928 and Wall Street bonuses hitting pre-2008 levels, we look at the 100-year history of secret collusion between Washington and the financial industry. In her new book, "All the Presidents’ Bankers: The Hidden Alliances that Drive American Power," financial journalist Nomi Prins explores how a small number of bankers have played critical roles in shaping a century’s worth of financial, foreign and domestic policy in the United States. Prins examines how these relationships have influenced events from the creation of the Federal Reserve, the response to the Great Depression, and the founding of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank. Now a senior fellow at Demos, Prins is a former managing director at Bear Stearns and Goldman Sachs, and previously an analyst at Lehman Brothers and Chase Manhattan Bank.
- Ukraine Moves to Retake Eastern Cities; Russia Accuses U.S. Firm of Secret Role
- 15 Killed by Roadside Bomb in Afghanistan
- Iraqi Children at Risk as Polio Spreads from Syria
- Egypt Court Upholds Prison Terms for 3 Top Activists
- Day of Action Calls for Release of Al Jazeera Journalists in Egypt
- Ban Ki-moon: "We Should Have Done Much More" to Stop Rwanda Genocide
- Jobless Aid Bill Passes Senate, Faces Battle in House
- Death Toll from Washington State Mudslide Hits 33
- New Details Emerge About Shooting at Fort Hood
- Supreme Court Rejects Appeal of Photographer Who Refused Service to Gay Couple
- Ex-CIA Director Hayden Criticized for Calling Feinstein "Emotional"
- Philippines Supreme Court Upholds Free Contraception Law
- Murder Charge Dismissed for Black Woman Who Gave Birth to Stillborn
- Author Peter Matthiessen Dies at 86; Final Novel Out Today
Declassified U.S. documents show the Clinton administration refused to label the 1994 mass killings in Rwanda as a genocide. One State Department document read: "Be careful … Genocide finding could commit U.S.G. to actually 'do something.'" At a press briefing in 1994, Reuters correspondent Alan Elsner asked: "How many acts of genocide does it take to make genocide?" State Department spokesperson Christine Shelley responded, "Alan, that’s just not a question that I’m in a position to answer." Samantha Power, who is now the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, described the U.S. inaction in her 2001 article, "Bystanders to Genocide." She wrote, "The United States did much more than fail to send troops. It led a successful effort to remove most of the UN peacekeepers who were already in Rwanda. It aggressively worked to block the subsequent authorization of UN reinforcements." We speak to Emily Willard of the National Security Archive, and University of Wisconsin, Madison, Professor Scott Straus, author of "The Order of Genocide: Race, Power, and War in Rwanda."
Rwanda is holding commemorations for the 20th anniversary of the genocide in which 800,000 people were killed. On April 6, 1994, Rwanda’s extremist Hutu government and military began a campaign to exterminate the minority Tutsis. Men, women and children were massacred in an orchestrated, pre-planned campaign of genocide not seen since the Nazi Holocaust. The world claimed it was unaware of the magnitude of the slaughter, and the United Nations peacekeeping force stationed in the country stood by helplessly and watched the massacre unfold. Today, Rwandan President Paul Kagame will light a flame that will burn for 100 days, the length of time it took government soldiers and Hutu militia to carry out the killings. France has pulled out of the events following accusations by Kagame that it participated in the mass killings. We are joined by two guests: Jina Moore, international women’s rights correspondent for BuzzFeed, reporting from Rwanda, and Jean-Marie Kamatali, a former dean of the National University of Rwanda School of Law.
Was Turkey behind last year’s Syrian chemical weapons attack? That is the question raised in a new exposé by Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh on the intelligence debate over the deaths of hundreds of Syrians in Ghouta last year. The United States, and much of the international community, blamed forces loyal to the Assad government, almost leading to a U.S. attack on Syria. But Hersh reveals the U.S. intelligence community feared Turkey was supplying sarin gas to Syrian rebels in the months before the attack took place — information never made public as President Obama made the case for launching a strike. Hersh joins us to discuss his findings.
- Nationwide Protests Call for End to Mass Deportation
- Obama Criticizes GOP Budget; ACA Adds 3 Million to Medicaid
- Report: Yemen Banned U.S. Military Drone Strikes After Wedding Attack
- Activists Unveil Giant Poster of Child's Face in Drone-Hit Area in Pakistan
- Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging U.S. Assassination of Americans Overseas
- Pro-Russian Demonstrators Seize Gov't Buildings in Ukraine
- Millions Vote in Afghan Elections
- Ambassador: U.S. Will Continue to "Deter Palestinian Action" on Statehood
- Albuquerque Mayor Requests Federal Monitoring of Police Force
- Ohio Newspaper Sues over Reporters' Military Detention
- Snowden, Poitras Win Ridenhour Prize for Truth-Telling
"U.S. Secretly Created 'Cuban Twitter' to Stir Unrest." That is the name of an explosive new article by the Associated Press detailing how the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) created a fake Twitter program to undermine the Cuban government. The communications network was called "ZunZuneo" — slang for a Cuban hummingbird’s tweet. It was reportedly built with secret shell companies financed through foreign banks. According to AP, the United States planned to use the platform to spread political content that might trigger a Cuban Spring, or, as one USAID document put it, "renegotiate the balance of power between the state and society." We speak to Peter Kornbluh, director of the Cuba Documentation Project at the National Security Archive. He recently wrote an article in Foreign Policy called "Our Man in Havana: Was USAID Planning to Overthrow Castro?"
We look at challenges faced by U.S. soldiers who served in Iraq and Afghanistan with investigative reporter Aaron Glantz, who has spent more than a decade covering the Iraq War and the treatment veterans receive when they come home. This week, The Center for Investigative Reporting won a prestigious Peabody Award for his report that exposes how the Department of Veterans Affairs has become the drug dealer of choice for many veterans who are now addicted to prescription painkillers, which were prescribed to treat a myriad of mental health and other physical injuries. According to the investigation, VA prescriptions for four opiates — hydrocodone, oxycodone, methadone and morphine — have surged by 270 percent in the past 12 years.
We begin today’s show at Fort Hood, Texas, where flags are flying at half-mast following Wednesday’s shooting that left four dead, including the gunman. Sixteen people were wounded in the attack. Authorities identified the shooter as 34-year-old Army Specialist Ivan Lopez, who was being evaluated for post-traumatic stress disorder. Lopez served in Iraq, but officials say he never saw combat. We speak with two Iraq War veterans: Ryan Holleran and Malachi Muncy, manager of the Under the Hood Café, a GI coffee shop near Fort Hood. Both are members of Iraq Veterans Against the War. "I had trouble getting help when I came back from Iraq, as well, when I was at Fort Hood. The access to healthcare is limited — it is available, but it’s not necessarily accessible," Holleran explains. "The amount of stigma associated with seeking any kind of mental health, it makes it extremely challenging to try to take care of ourselves." We also talk to Aaron Glantz, who covers veterans and domestic military issues for The Center for Investigative Reporting. His most recent book is "The War Comes Home: Washington’s Battle Against America’s Veterans."
- Senate Intel Committee Votes to Release Parts of Torture Report
- AP Photographer Shot Dead by Afghan Police Officer; Colleague Wounded
- Afghans to Vote in Presidential Election
- Report: USAID Launched Fake Twitter Platform to Undermine Cuban Gov't
- Anadarko to Pay $5 Billion to Settle Toxic Pollution Case
- Activist-Journalist Barrett Brown Reaches Plea Deal in Stratfor Case
- Mideast Peace Talks Founder After Israel Cancels Prisoner Release
- ACLU Sues over Solitary Confinement of Hunger Strikers at Immigration Jail
- Mississippi Governor Signs "Religious Freedom" Bill Seen as Anti-Gay
- Texas Executes Prisoner Using Drug from Undisclosed Supplier
- Citigroup Faces Criminal Probe over Fraud at Mexican Unit
- UPS Fires 250 Workers for Staging 90-Minute Walkout
- Mozilla CEO Steps Down After Protests over Anti-Gay Views
- Drug Overdose Treatment Approved for Home Use amid Nationwide Epidemic
Ex-Auto Safety Head & Parent of Dead Victim: GM CEOs Should Face Prison for Covering Up Safety Flaws
In 2005, General Motors decided not to change a defective ignition switch redesign because it would have added about a dollar to the cost of each car. At least 13 people have died in accidents as a result, though the number could be much higher. Following two days of contentious congressional testimony by GM CEO Mary Barra, we are joined by two guests: Ken Rimer, whose 18-year-old stepdaughter Natasha Weigel died in a defective Chevy Cobalt in 2005, and consumer advocate Joan Claybrook, former head of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
"The Next Citizens United": McCutcheon Opens Floodgates for 1 Percent to Spend Millions on Campaigns
We continue our coverage of Wednesday’s Supreme Court decision in the case of McCutcheon v. FEC, described by many as "the next Citizens United." In a 5-to-4 vote, the court’s conservative justices eliminated a long-standing limit on how much donors can give in total to federal candidates, party committees and political action committees in a two-year election cycle. We are joined by Andy Kroll, senior reporter at Mother Jones magazine, who has extensively covered campaign finance and anonymous donations, called "dark money."
As the 2014 election season gets underway, the Supreme Court has struck down a long-standing limit on how much donors can give to federal candidates, political parties and political action committees in a two-year election cycle. Without any aggregate limit, a donor can now give millions directly to candidates and parties. The 5-to-4 decision in the McCutcheon v. FEC case is being described as the "next Citizens United," referring to the 2010 ruling that opened the floodgates for unlimited corporate spending on U.S. elections. We speak to Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont about Wednesday’s landmark decision and his fight to remove big money from the electoral process. We also discuss Sanders’ potential presidential run in 2016, which he says he is considering "not because I wake up in the morning with a burning desire to be president … but [because] I happen to believe there are such enormous issues out there that I just don’t want to see swept under the rug."
- Iraq War Vet Kills 3, Wounds 16 Before Taking Own Life in Fort Hood Rampage
- Supreme Court Strikes Down Election Cycle Limits on Political Donations
- Obama Campaigns for $10.10 Minimum Wage
- New York City Apartment Building Workers March Ahead of Strike Vote
- GOP Senator, Gov. Coordinated with Anti-Union Effort in Tennessee
- Texas Abortion Providers Challenge Anti-Choice Law
- Mississippi Lawmakers Advance Anti-Abortion, Anti-LGBT Bills
- Former Gov't Contractor Sentenced to 13 Months for North Korea Leak
- Senate Report Finds Caterpillar Evaded Billions in Taxes
- 18 Nations Ratify U.N. Arms Treaty
- European Parliament Votes to Adopt Net Neutrality